The Lockerbie bomber was convicted on evidence « selected » by judges to reach conclusions that could not be justified.
Claire Mitchell, QC, told the Court of Appeals that her client, the late Abdul Baset Ali al-Megrahi, was the victim of a bad judgment.
The lawyer spoke from al-Megrahi’s family on the first day of an appeal to clarify his name. It is the third time that al-Megrahi, who died in 2012, has been appealed to the judges.
Ms. Mitchell told a jury of five judges that no reasonable jury could have found a guilty verdict against al-Megrahi. She said there were reasonable doubts about his involvement in the Pan bombing
Pan Am Flight 103, Abdelbaset al-Megrahi, Lockerbie, Scotland, appeal
EbeneMagazine – AU – Lockerbie bomber al-Megrahi, convicted of « Kirschbaum evidence, » shared that Court of Appeal with